Showing posts with label rants. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rants. Show all posts

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Vogue Russia - November 2011 - RANT

I simply cannot not talk about this. When I saw this Vogue cover, I had to "take-two" and actually make sure I was looking at Vogue and not Penthouse or some other similar publication.

I mean Vogue is Vogue regardless of whether it is Russian, French or American. Vogue is the pinnacle of style, fashion and everything that is exquisite. Vogue is also a woman's territory. I personally think that if you are a man, unless you are Tom Ford, you should not, under any circumstances, appear on a cover of any Vogue.  

It is a common view that after Alena Doletskaya left Vogue Russia, the magazine somewhat got a little bit lost. The content is still good and relevant but the whole publication became very .. well "russian". In my view Vogue should be international, it should be written in the international language of style and should connect people in Russia (or wherever) with the rest of the fashion community worldwide. 

I personally was offended, disappointed and even disgusted that such a cover would even be allowed to be published under those coveted five letters. Russia is already overly, overtly sexual... too much for my liking. Luckily the likes of Vogue, Harpers Bazaar and Elle somehow managed to keep their integrity and style...until now that is.

The editors of Vogue Russia should really reconsider why they are publishing this magazine. The primitive view is that Vogue is a magazine about clothes..well I mean the shoot with Adam Levine and Anna Vyalitsina hardly even contained any clothes!!! Don't get me wrong, I think the pictures are very well done, except they are better suited to GQ perhaps. Ahhh, this really made me angry. Just when you think Russia is finally coming out of its "Eurotrash" dump of a stereotype, you see something like this and realise how long it will be before Russia will become a style arena in a true and full sense of that word. Shame, shame, shame on you Vogue Russia!





Monday, May 16, 2011

Kate Moss for Parisienne by YSL - Rant



Parisienne - 2011 ad campaign

I actually had the exact same thoughts last year when the first Parisienne fragrance came out, except back then I didn't have this blog. Well now I do, and Parisienne is having a re-run.

Kate Moss, aka ‘the love of my life’, the most stylish, my most admired is once again the face of Parisienne by YSL fragrance campaign.

I had mixed feelings when I saw this last year and I have the same feelings about it now. On the one hand, I love Kate Moss and she can do no wrong. On the other hand, I laugh at the fact that Kate, the ultimate Brit, the ex-face of Burberry (i mean, how more Brit can you get?!) is now also the "ultimate Parisienne"?!

I don’t really care if the message YSL is trying to send is ‘anyone can be a Parisian’ or ‘its your style that makes you Parisian’ or whatever it might be… I say – DOWN WITH THIS FASHION GLOBALISATION! Why is it that stereotypes are bad?? Some times they can be good.. Like the stereotypical French/Parisian lady.. the one who is meant to ooze elegance and chic and the je-ne-sais-qoui.

Like Audrey Tatou.. or Melanie Laurent.. or Marion Cotillard...

Kate Moss is a legend - not doubt about that. But in my humble opinion she was a wrong choice for this particular campaign. That is all. 
Parisienne - 2010 ad campaign

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Old Flame - Lilly Allen for Chanel - RANT


This ad is no longer relevant because it is from yonks years ago but it is an old flame for me - it just always really bothered me. It's not even that I mind Lilly Allen so much, it is Lilly Allen in combination with Chanel that had ticked me off. Lilly Allen is/was a pop star, a very successful one at that but a pop star nonetheless. Chanel is an icon, a mecca, the holy grail of fashion. I know uncle Karl said that he picked Lilly because she is a self-made woman but there is so much more to it than that. For me personally, this was a disappointment in Chanel more than anything. Chanel stands for elegance, heritage, femininity, status. Lilly Allen, as nice as she is, stands for none of those things (or at least she didnt until her magical Chanel makeover). It just did not make sense to me. Lilly is a jolly english girl who likes a drink and a laugh and doesnt take herself too seriously. As great as that is - that is not enough for Chanel. No matter how drastic the makeover, she is still Lilly Allen - a brand name in her own right, but a brand name that represents nothing of what Chanel is all about. Sorry Lilly! Not happy, uncle Karl! 

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Tatler UK, February cover - Rant

I'm lost for words. Why pick an image that makes Kate look like she is in her 40's? Dreadful. 

Van Cleef & Arpels advertisement


This is also a long time un-favorite. I mean, lets think about this... Van Cleef & Arpels, a fine jewellery luxury brand. Probably competing for the market share along Cartier and Tiffany & Co. And yet every single time I see this ad, it just makes me think of either some kind of detergent or air freshener. I think it must be the blue skies and the green grass that automatically makes me think of fresh air, endless pastures and milky clouds... Hang on a minute.. now that I think about it... May be it's not detergent at all, may be it is Milka chocolate or a yoghurt... hmmm

In any case, fine jewellery is the last thing that comes to mind. There are just so many questions that I have about this ad: why is she blowing bubbles? bubbles - soapy? what's the message here? Also what's with the haircut? That fringe... I don't think it looks anything like the demographic that VC&A are aiming for. She does not look like a sophisticated, well-to-do Park Avenue lady.. She looks like a girl next door, possibly who sells ice-cream for some part-time cash.. There it is again! Dairy, ice-cream, cows... I just can't get away from it! Anyhow, it would be interesting to find out how successful this campaign was because to me it makes no sense whatsoever! 

Elle UK February cover - Keira Knightley

This cover bugged me the minute I saw it. I think I even tweeted @ Elle about it. It's the eye. Look at her eye. It is not completely and fully open and hence the flick of the eyelashes is not complete and hence she looks either stoned or half asleep. This shot could've been good for an editorial page but not a cover!!! I mean come on people...